The German Federal Court of Justice recently clarified online platforms' liability for user-generated content, ruling platforms aren't directly liable without knowledge but must act swiftly upon notification, significantly impacting digital service providers across Europe.
Australia’s eSafety Commissioner ordered Telegram to pay AUD 1 million for ignoring transparency obligations. Officials requested details on terrorist and child sexual content steps, but Telegram delayed months, triggering enforcement under the Online Safety Act.
On 28 February 2025, Japan’s Cabinet announced significant plans to introduce a Bill to promote research, development, and practical application of artificial intelligence technologies. The legislation focuses on transparency, protection of rights, and international cooperation.
Public Consultation on Digital Assets in Scotland: Have Your Say on Legislative Reforms
The Scottish Government has launched a public consultation on recognising digital assets as property under private law. Open until 5 February 2025, this initiative seeks to modernise Scottish law, fostering innovation while addressing legal challenges in the emerging digital economy.
Shaping the Future of Digital Property: Scotland's Consultation on Digital Assets
The Scottish Government has embarked on a significant initiative to modernise its legal framework by addressing the growing prominence of digital assets in private law.
Through a public consultation open until 5 February 2025, Scotland seeks to redefine the status of digital assets as property, ensuring its laws align with the rapid evolution of technology and finance.
This consultation marks a prime moment in Scotland’s journey to embrace innovation while preserving its legal integrity.
Understanding the Consultation Goals
Digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and other blockchain-based innovations, are revolutionising how we perceive and interact with property.
Yet, legal systems worldwide are grappling with the challenge of categorising and regulating these assets. Recognising this, the Scottish Government’s consultation aims to gather diverse perspectives on:
Establishing clear legal definitions and statuses for digital assets under Scots private law.
Evaluating the potential impact of digital assets on traditional property rights.
Strengthening Scotland’s position as a hub for digital innovation and financial growth.
By engaging stakeholders across sectors, including legal professionals, tech industry experts, academics, and the public, the government hopes to lay the groundwork for legislation that reflects the digital age's realities.
The importance of this initiative cannot be overstated. Digital assets are increasingly integral to financial systems, commerce, and personal investments. However, their legal recognition remains ambiguous in many jurisdictions, creating uncertainty for individuals and businesses.
Enhance Legal Clarity: Clear definitions and frameworks for digital assets can reduce disputes, foster investor confidence, and facilitate seamless transactions.
Boost Economic Competitiveness: A robust legal environment for digital assets could attract fintech companies, blockchain startups, and investors to Scotland, strengthening the national economy.
Future-Proof the Legal System: Adapting to technological advancements ensures Scotland’s legal system remains relevant and resilient in the face of change.
A Collaborative Approach
The Scottish Government’s proactive stance clarifies the value of collective input in shaping policy. Contributors are encouraged to share their expertise, experiences, and concerns, ensuring the consultation captures a comprehensive view of the challenges and opportunities presented by digital assets.
This collaborative process reflects Scotland’s commitment to inclusivity and innovation, recognising that robust laws are built on diverse insights. Importantly, the government emphasises that the feedback gathered will directly influence the legislative reforms, making this consultation a critical platform for those invested in the future of digital property.
Broader Implications
Scotland’s exploration of digital assets in private law mirrors global trends. Nations worldwide are grappling with questions about how digital assets fit within existing legal frameworks, from property and intellectual property laws to tax and regulatory policies.
As these discussions continue, Scotland has the chance to position itself as a leader in digital asset governance. By setting clear and progressive standards, it could serve as a model for other jurisdictions while attracting global partnerships and innovation.
The Road Ahead
As the February 2025 deadline approaches, stakeholders have a unique window to influence the trajectory of digital asset legislation in Scotland. Whether you are a legal professional, business owner, academic, or technology enthusiast, this is your chance to shape the future of property law in a digital age.
To participate in the consultation or learn more about its objectives, visit the official Scottish Government website.
European Central Bank expands distributed ledger settlement possibilities by linking these transactions with central bank money. This approach seeks to promote a secure foundation for tokenised trading, while opening pathways for cross-border and foreign exchange operations.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has launched a Crypto Task Force to develop clear regulatory guidelines, streamline registration processes, and coordinate with federal agencies. This initiative aims to balance innovation with strong investor protection measures.
Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission has introduced new cybersecurity and asset protection circular for virtual asset trading platforms. The guidelines mandate strong security monitoring, asset segregation, and due diligence to enhance compliance and consumer protection.
In Getty Images (US) Inc v Stability AI Ltd (2025), the court examined whether Stability AI unlawfully used Getty Images’ copyrighted works to train its AI models. Getty Images argued that Stability AI’s data scraping and reproduction of protected images constituted copyright infringement.