The German Federal Court of Justice recently clarified online platforms' liability for user-generated content, ruling platforms aren't directly liable without knowledge but must act swiftly upon notification, significantly impacting digital service providers across Europe.
Australia’s eSafety Commissioner ordered Telegram to pay AUD 1 million for ignoring transparency obligations. Officials requested details on terrorist and child sexual content steps, but Telegram delayed months, triggering enforcement under the Online Safety Act.
On 28 February 2025, Japan’s Cabinet announced significant plans to introduce a Bill to promote research, development, and practical application of artificial intelligence technologies. The legislation focuses on transparency, protection of rights, and international cooperation.
The EU's new Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCA) requires crypto issuers to provide detailed white papers, disclose asset reserves, and meet cybersecurity standards, aiming to protect investors and increase accountability within the cryptocurrency market.
Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on markets in crypto-assets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 and Directives 2013/36/EU and (EU) 2019/1937 (Text with EEA relevance)
The Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCA) introduces reforms to bring structure and trust into digital currencies.
Starting 30 December 2024, this EU regulation will impose strict requirements on crypto-asset issuers and service providers, fostering greater transparency and security in an industry often viewed as opaque.
Let’s dive into what this means for stakeholders and why it matters now more than ever.
MiCA is the European Union's answer to the increasing call for regulation in the crypto space.
Designed to apply to issuers and service providers of crypto assets, this regulation is set to create a safer environment for both investors and operators.
Its key feature? Transparency. For the first time, issuers are required to submit a white paper detailing the characteristics of the crypto asset, including data on reserve assets and the rights and obligations of consumers.
This document must receive regulatory approval before going public—a measure that introduces accountability to the sector.
White papers have long been a staple in the cryptocurrency world, but their standards have varied widely.
MiCA changes this by setting strict guidelines on what must be included:
With these new requirements, potential buyers can access credible, vetted information before committing their resources.
For investors accustomed to vague or non-existent details from crypto projects, this reform offers an appropriate safeguard.
Beyond transparency, MiCA addresses the critical issue of cybersecurity. Issuers must demonstrate that their systems are resilient against threats to protect investors' assets.
This element of the regulation reflects growing concerns over hacks, fraud, and the misuse of funds within the crypto market.
Non-compliance is no small matter. Authorities now have the power to suspend activities if cybersecurity requirements are not met. This hardline approach signals that the EU is serious about fostering trust in a space that has long battled skepticism.
Leila Saunders
MiCA doesn't just apply to token issuers; service providers are also in its sights. Crypto exchanges, wallet providers, and other platforms offering access to digital assets must also adhere to these new rules.
The regulation’s scope even extends to stablecoins, a category that has recently drawn scrutiny for its potential to destabilise financial systems. By regulating these assets, MiCA aims to address concerns about their underlying reserves and ensure their claims of stability hold up under scrutiny.
Not surprisingly, MiCA has sparked varied reactions within the crypto community. Advocates of responsible regulation see it as a necessary step toward legitimacy and wider adoption. The ability to identify bad actors and elevate credible projects is a win for the industry.
However, critics worry about the potential stifling effect of regulation. For smaller issuers and startups, the cost and complexity of compliance could pose significant barriers.
Some fear that overly stringent rules may dampen innovation or push developers to jurisdictions with more lenient frameworks.
While MiCA’s provisions are ambitious, enforcing them will be no easy task. The crypto world thrives on its borderless nature, and ensuring compliance across multiple countries presents a logistical puzzle. Authorities will need robust monitoring mechanisms and cooperation to make the regulation effective.
Additionally, the introduction of pre-approved white papers could create bottlenecks in the system. Delays in approval may frustrate issuers and slow down the pace of new developments in the market.
The European Commission recently submitted a proposal for an EU Blueprint on cybersecurity crisis management. The recommendation outlines response mechanisms, promotes Union, and calls for collaboration between civilian authorities and military partners.
The European Data Protection Board has broadened its task force to include DeepSeek alongside other advanced AI systems, establishing a quick response team to support national data protection authorities in enforcing privacy rules effectively nationwide.
European Central Bank expands distributed ledger settlement possibilities by linking these transactions with central bank money. This approach seeks to promote a secure foundation for tokenised trading, while opening pathways for cross-border and foreign exchange operations.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has launched a Crypto Task Force to develop clear regulatory guidelines, streamline registration processes, and coordinate with federal agencies. This initiative aims to balance innovation with strong investor protection measures.
Follow the latest Tech Law news and updates about AI, Digital Assets, Internet Law, Data Protection, LawTech.
