The German Federal Court of Justice recently clarified online platforms' liability for user-generated content, ruling platforms aren't directly liable without knowledge but must act swiftly upon notification, significantly impacting digital service providers across Europe.
Australia’s eSafety Commissioner ordered Telegram to pay AUD 1 million for ignoring transparency obligations. Officials requested details on terrorist and child sexual content steps, but Telegram delayed months, triggering enforcement under the Online Safety Act.
On 28 February 2025, Japan’s Cabinet announced significant plans to introduce a Bill to promote research, development, and practical application of artificial intelligence technologies. The legislation focuses on transparency, protection of rights, and international cooperation.
AI is transforming the entertainment industry, raising critical questions in entertainment law. From de-aging actors to copyrighting generative works, legal frameworks are being modernised to address AI's impact on creativity, authorship, and fair compensation for writers and artists.
AI’s Role in Motion Picture Entertainment: From Fiction to Reality
Once confined to science fiction blockbusters, artificial intelligence (AI) has now stepped into a very real role behind the scenes, reshaping entertainment law in ways few could have imagined.
From Strikes to Agreements: AI and the WGA
In 2023, AI became a central focus of industry negotiations, sparking major debates during the Writers Guild of America (WGA) and SAG-AFTRA strikes.
After a staggering 148 days of protest, the WGA secured a deal that gives writers more control over how AI is used in their work. Writers can now decide whether to use AI tools, provided the studio consents.
Additionally, any studio-provided AI-generated material will not affect a writer’s compensation, credit, or rights. This clause alone speaks volumes about the increasing prominence of AI in the creative process.
The fine details of these negotiations reflect a growing reality: AI isn’t just a tool; it’s a new player in the entertainment game. Writers and creatives are grappling with how to coexist with AI technologies while maintaining the value of human ingenuity.
AI’s foray into entertainment is not just about reshaping scripts—it’s transforming the nuts and bolts of production and post-production.
Companies like Avid and Adobe have introduced AI-powered tools into their software, streamlining tasks that once required significant time and resources.
These innovations promise to lower production costs while increasing accessibility for filmmakers and other creatives.
This technology has allowed filmmakers to maintain continuity in storytelling, creating a seamless bridge between past and present.
Imagine seeing a beloved character return to the screen exactly as they appeared decades ago. While some may find this unsettling, advocates argue that AI enhances the creative process rather than replacing the artists themselves.
Technology Law
Read the latest Technology Law updates and news on artificial intelligence, privacy and data protection law, digital assets regulation, and beyond—delivered straight to your inbox!
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Generative AI: A New Era of Creativity
The rise of generative AI programs like ChatGPT has added another layer of intrigue. These tools have sparked debates about originality, creativity, and even legality.
Can something created by an algorithm truly belong to anyone?
Generative AI works are trained on vast amounts of pre-existing content, raising questions about their copyright-ability.
This position was further reinforced in the recent Thaler v. Perlmutter case, where the court declared that “human authorship is a bedrock requirement of copyright.”
The Naruto Case and AI’s Legal Quandary
The legal landscape surrounding AI-generated works finds an interesting parallel in Naruto v Slater, 888 F.3d 418 (2018). In this case, a monkey’s attempt to claim copyright over its own selfie fell flat because, as the court noted, the Copyright Act only applies to human authors. AI faces a similar hurdle.
Despite its impressive capabilities, AI is not a person and, therefore, cannot claim authorship under current copyright law.
This issue isn’t just theoretical—it has real implications for creators and studios. If AI cannot hold copyright, who owns the material it produces?
Does it default to the programmer, the user, or does it enter the public domain?
These are questions that the entertainment industry, lawmakers, and society at large will need to grapple with as AI continues to blur the lines between human and machine creativity.
Balancing Act: AI as a Creative Partner
For many, AI represents a double-edged sword. On one hand, it offers tools that can inspire and expand the creative process.
On the other, it challenges the traditional notions of authorship and originality. Proponents argue that AI should be viewed as a collaborator rather than a replacement for human creativity.
For example, filmmakers can use AI to experiment with visual effects, test different plotlines, or even generate dialogue ideas—all while retaining ultimate control over the final product.
Similarly, writers might find AI useful for brainstorming or polishing scripts. The technology, they argue, is a means to enhance storytelling, not to automate it entirely.
The Future Is Now
As AI becomes more deeply ingrained in the fabric of entertainment, the industry faces both challenges and opportunities. Whether it is negotiating fair use agreements, exploring the ethical implications of de-aging actors, or grappling with copyright law, the integration of AI into Hollywood is anything but simple.
But one thing is clear: AI is no longer a concept confined to science fiction—it’s here, it’s real, and it’s rewriting the rules of entertainment law.
While the industry works to strike the right balance, audiences will be watching—sometimes in awe, sometimes with skepticism—as the lines between human and machine creativity continue to blur. Whether AI becomes a hero or a villain in Hollywood’s story, its role is certain to be anything but minor.
On 28 February 2025, Japan’s Cabinet announced significant plans to introduce a Bill to promote research, development, and practical application of artificial intelligence technologies. The legislation focuses on transparency, protection of rights, and international cooperation.
California introduced Bill AB 1018 to regulate automated decision systems impacting employment, education, housing, and healthcare. The Bill mandates performance evaluations, independent audits, and consumer disclosures to ensure accountability and transparent decision-making.
The European Data Protection Board has broadened its task force to include DeepSeek alongside other advanced AI systems, establishing a quick response team to support national data protection authorities in enforcing privacy rules effectively nationwide.
Japan’s Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry published a new AI contract checklist to help companies handle AI safely and effectively. It covers data protection, intellectual property rights, and legal considerations for domestic and international agreements