The German Federal Court of Justice recently clarified online platforms' liability for user-generated content, ruling platforms aren't directly liable without knowledge but must act swiftly upon notification, significantly impacting digital service providers across Europe.
Australia’s eSafety Commissioner ordered Telegram to pay AUD 1 million for ignoring transparency obligations. Officials requested details on terrorist and child sexual content steps, but Telegram delayed months, triggering enforcement under the Online Safety Act.
On 28 February 2025, Japan’s Cabinet announced significant plans to introduce a Bill to promote research, development, and practical application of artificial intelligence technologies. The legislation focuses on transparency, protection of rights, and international cooperation.
California's Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Services Bill mandates disclaimers on AI-generated clinical communications, requiring transparency and providing patients with instructions to contact human providers, while excluding licensed professional-approved content and administrative uses.
Starting 1 January 2025, California healthcare providers using generative artificial intelligence (AI) for clinical communications must comply with a new law, the Artificial Intelligence in Health Care Services Bill (AB 3030).
This regulation, designed to safeguard transparency in patient interactions, mandates clear disclaimers and accessibility measures for AI-generated content.
The new law applies to a wide range of healthcare settings, including hospitals, clinics, and private practices.
Under AB 3030, any clinical communication generated by AI must prominently feature a disclaimer notifying patients that the content was created using generative AI.
Additionally, these communications must include instructions on how patients can contact a human healthcare provider for further assistance.
The requirements are tailored to specific mediums:
Not all AI-generated communications fall under the regulation. AB 3030 excludes communications that have been reviewed and approved by a licensed healthcare provider.
Administrative uses, such as appointment scheduling or billing, are also outside the bill's scope, allowing healthcare providers to focus compliance efforts on patient-facing clinical interactions.
Enforcement of AB 3030 will involve existing medical boards and regulatory bodies.
Violations by physicians or healthcare facilities could lead to penalties under the Health and Safety Code or action by the Medical Board of California or Osteopathic Medical Board of California.
The law reflects California's effort to balance the innovative potential of AI with the need for human accountability in healthcare. Generative AI has shown immense promise in drafting patient communications, from summarising medical records to crafting care instructions.
However, concerns over accuracy, trust, and the depersonalisation of care have fuelled the demand for regulations like AB 3030.
Healthcare organisations now face the challenge of integrating these requirements into their operations. From updating software systems to training staff on compliance protocols, the burden of implementation is significant but necessary.
Providers must also manage potential patient resistance, as AI disclaimers could raise questions about the reliability of their communications.
California's AB 3030 is part of a broader movement to regulate the use of AI in critical sectors. By focusing on transparency and patient engagement, the law sets a precedent for ethical AI practices in healthcare, ensuring that technology enhances rather than undermines trust in medical services.
On 28 February 2025, Japan’s Cabinet announced significant plans to introduce a Bill to promote research, development, and practical application of artificial intelligence technologies. The legislation focuses on transparency, protection of rights, and international cooperation.
California introduced Bill AB 1018 to regulate automated decision systems impacting employment, education, housing, and healthcare. The Bill mandates performance evaluations, independent audits, and consumer disclosures to ensure accountability and transparent decision-making.
The European Data Protection Board has broadened its task force to include DeepSeek alongside other advanced AI systems, establishing a quick response team to support national data protection authorities in enforcing privacy rules effectively nationwide.
The CFPB seeks to categorise certain data brokers as consumer reporting agencies under Regulation V. Doing so would tighten obligations, require more transparency, and ensure consumers can see, correct, and control their own information.
Follow the latest Tech Law news and updates about AI, Digital Assets, Internet Law, Data Protection, LawTech.
