The German Federal Court of Justice recently clarified online platforms' liability for user-generated content, ruling platforms aren't directly liable without knowledge but must act swiftly upon notification, significantly impacting digital service providers across Europe.
Australia’s eSafety Commissioner ordered Telegram to pay AUD 1 million for ignoring transparency obligations. Officials requested details on terrorist and child sexual content steps, but Telegram delayed months, triggering enforcement under the Online Safety Act.
On 28 February 2025, Japan’s Cabinet announced significant plans to introduce a Bill to promote research, development, and practical application of artificial intelligence technologies. The legislation focuses on transparency, protection of rights, and international cooperation.
Digital Replica Bill (AB 1836) Implements Clear Guidelines For Using Realistic Computer-Generated Likenesses
California’s Digital Replica Bill (AB 1836) prohibits unauthorised use of digital likenesses, including deceased individuals. Violators face penalties of at least $10,000 or actual damages, therefore enabling greater respect for personal and intellectual property rights in digital representations.
Digital Replica Bill Targets Unauthorised Use of Likenesses
As of 1 January 2025, California’s Use of Likeness: Digital Replica Bill (AB 1836) has entered into force, ushering in a new era of legal protections against the unauthorised use of individuals’ digital likenesses.
This nascent legislation establishes clear rules around how computer-generated, highly realistic digital replicas of individuals can be used, particularly posthumously.
The Bill defines a “digital replica” as a computer-generated representation that closely mimics an individual’s voice or visual likeness in sound recordings, audiovisual works, or transmissions.
These replicas may either depict performances the individual never participated in or alter the fundamental character of an actual performance.
The legislation aims to ensure that the use of such technology respects both the intellectual property and personal rights of individuals and their estates.
Protecting Deceased Personalities
One of the most striking provisions of AB 1836 is its focus on deceased individuals. Under the new law, any use of a deceased person’s likeness without prior authorisation from their estate can result in damages.
The minimum penalty for such an infraction is $10,000 or the actual damages incurred, whichever is greater. This measure offers strong protection against the exploitation of famous figures and their digital representations in commercial ventures.
Technology Law
Read the latest Technology Law updates and news on artificial intelligence, privacy and data protection law, digital assets regulation, and beyond—delivered straight to your inbox!
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Balancing Artistic and Commercial Uses
While the Bill takes a hard stance against unauthorised commercial uses, it does allow for certain exceptions.
For instance, the use of digital replicas in works of political, educational, or satirical value is permitted.
Documentaries, biographical works, and fleeting or incidental uses of digital replicas also fall outside the scope of the restrictions. However, any attempt to create a false impression that a deceased individual actively participated in a work is strictly prohibited.
Implications for the Entertainment Industry
The entertainment sector, a primary user of digital replica technology, is directly impacted by this legislation.
The Bill requires creators and distributors to secure clearances before using a digital replica, ensuring that intellectual property rights are respected.
This could significantly alter the way films, advertisements, and virtual performances are produced, particularly in cases where deceased artists are brought back to life on screen.
On 28 February 2025, Japan’s Cabinet announced significant plans to introduce a Bill to promote research, development, and practical application of artificial intelligence technologies. The legislation focuses on transparency, protection of rights, and international cooperation.
California introduced Bill AB 1018 to regulate automated decision systems impacting employment, education, housing, and healthcare. The Bill mandates performance evaluations, independent audits, and consumer disclosures to ensure accountability and transparent decision-making.
The European Data Protection Board has broadened its task force to include DeepSeek alongside other advanced AI systems, establishing a quick response team to support national data protection authorities in enforcing privacy rules effectively nationwide.
The CFPB seeks to categorise certain data brokers as consumer reporting agencies under Regulation V. Doing so would tighten obligations, require more transparency, and ensure consumers can see, correct, and control their own information.