The German Federal Court of Justice recently clarified online platforms' liability for user-generated content, ruling platforms aren't directly liable without knowledge but must act swiftly upon notification, significantly impacting digital service providers across Europe.
Australia’s eSafety Commissioner ordered Telegram to pay AUD 1 million for ignoring transparency obligations. Officials requested details on terrorist and child sexual content steps, but Telegram delayed months, triggering enforcement under the Online Safety Act.
On 28 February 2025, Japan’s Cabinet announced significant plans to introduce a Bill to promote research, development, and practical application of artificial intelligence technologies. The legislation focuses on transparency, protection of rights, and international cooperation.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry denied allegations of unlawful data sharing by companies like TikTok and Temu, stating they operate under local laws. This statement comes amid increasing global scrutiny of Chinese firms and their data practices.
On 17 January 2025, the Chinese Foreign Ministry issued a statement addressing allegations that Chinese companies, including e-commerce platform Temu and social media giant TikTok, have unlawfully shared user data with the Chinese Government.
These allegations have circulated widely, fuelling debates around privacy, national security, and corporate governance in international markets.
In its statement, the Foreign Ministry categorically denied the claims, asserting that the Chinese Government has neither requested nor will request companies or individuals to collect or share data in violation of local laws in the countries where they operate.
This stance is intended to counter concerns about the potential misuse of consumer data and reinforce China's commitment to respecting international legal frameworks.
The statement also called for adherence to principles of a market economy and fair competition, arguing that Chinese companies should be granted the same protections and rights as their global counterparts when operating abroad.
Chinese firms such as TikTok, operated by ByteDance, and Temu, an e-commerce platform rapidly gaining traction globally, have faced increasing scrutiny over data privacy.
Critics allege that these companies are required by Chinese laws to provide access to user data upon government request, raising fears of unauthorised surveillance and breaches of personal privacy.
TikTok, in particular, has been at the centre of controversy in Western nations. Lawmakers and regulators in the United States and Europe have expressed concerns over its data handling practices, leading to investigations and, in some cases, bans on the app in government settings.
Temu, a relative newcomer to global markets, is also under scrutiny, with critics questioning how its rapid expansion is being financed and whether its data practices align with international standards.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry’s statement seeks to address these accusations by reiterating that any data-related activities by Chinese companies must comply with local laws where they operate. This message is seen as an attempt to build trust and ease tensions in key international markets.
The Foreign Ministry's remarks come at a time when the global conversation about data security and privacy is intensifying. Governments worldwide are introducing stricter regulations to protect user data and ensure transparency in how businesses collect, store, and use personal information.
The allegations against Chinese companies highlight broader concerns about the intersection of technology, governance, and geopolitics.
For Chinese companies operating internationally, these allegations have tangible implications. Countries imposing stricter data privacy laws may view Chinese firms with heightened suspicion, potentially affecting their market access and reputation.
On the other hand, statements such as the one from the Foreign Ministry are intended to counteract such perceptions and reinforce the narrative that Chinese companies operate in good faith within the jurisdictions they enter.
Italy has enforced new rules requiring digital devices to support parental control apps, ensuring parents can monitor children's online activity. The law also prevents companies from using collected data for advertising or profiling, strengthening privacy protections.
The CFPB seeks to categorise certain data brokers as consumer reporting agencies under Regulation V. Doing so would tighten obligations, require more transparency, and ensure consumers can see, correct, and control their own information.
House Bill H.210, introduced in Vermont, outlines new guidelines for digital platforms handling minors’ data. By mandating default high-privacy settings and transparent practices, legislators aim to reduce risks of emotional harm and excessive data harvesting.
Both GDPR and HIPAA are key regulations focused on protecting sensitive data. GDPR applies to personal data of EU residents, while HIPAA governs healthcare data in the U.S. Organisations must comply with both for international operations.
Follow the latest Tech Law news and updates about AI, Digital Assets, Internet Law, Data Protection, LawTech.
